When my friend Nandu posted this on his facebook wall, I was intrigued after seeing the clip that was attached. “Recently watched the movie ” Hereafter” on DVD having missed it first time round ( released 2010 ) – unbelievable that I did , considering it is directed by Clint Eastwood and stars Matt Damon !! Here is the most awesome ( near ) opening scene which should whet anyone’s appetite to see the brilliant movie if they have missed it!”
I promptly sent for a DVD of it and even briefly mentioned it in my post “Too Strange.” In that post, I had mentioned that I will eventually review the film and this is the review.
Let me start off by saying that with the hype of Clint Eastwood and Matt Damon being the motivating factors behind the decision to send for the DVD, I was a bit disappointed with the whole experience and in my post on “Too Strange”, this is what I had said – “Seeing “Hereafter” was a very unusual and indescribable experience. It is more so because it has been produced and directed by Clint Eastwood and one naturally wonders as to what prompted him to do so on a film with such an odd theme. Be that as it may, it is not a film that I would have seen had it not been recommended by someone I knew and so the surprise.”
The film revolves around three individuals whose various experiences eventually bring them together and two of them to a romantic relationship as well. The common thread that does this is one individual, played by Matt Damon being able to “connect” with dead people. That is what would have normally put me off from seeing the film but I was intrigued enough to see what it was all about.
That connecting with the dead part plays a small role but portrayal of the three individuals by Matt Damon, Cécile de France and a young lad Frankie McLaren is of the highest order and I must credit the director Clint Eastwood for getting such performances out of them. He has also avoided over use of the mystery aspect of the story and has brought the human elements to the fore which is creditable.
The story however lacks credibility, at least with me and therefore, despite it having been produced by another icon Steven Spielberg, I cannot see myself giving the film more than a [rating=4] rating. Had I investigated a little more before I rushed to buy the DVD, I would not have spent the 130 minutes watching it. There are however people who are intrigued by the occult and mediums and such paranormal phenomena to whom this it likely to appeal, particularly with such a famous producer/director/actor team.
12 thoughts on “Hereafter.”
You have stated one of the reasons that I no longer go to the movies, Rummy. There are two others which I’m sure you can figure out. I like the old movies where actors had to get by on ability.
blessings ~ maxi
Maxi recently posted..Behind These Walls
I can and I don’t blame you.
I just checked the IMDB ratings and they suck so I’ll pass on this one 🙂
wisewebwoman recently posted..Back in the Saddle.
Good decision. You will not miss much.
After reading your earlier post, I watched the film on TV. I thought that it was a nice coincidence the film becoming so readily available, just after you mentioned it on your blog. I share your assessment but I watched the film with some interest even if the story was not convincing. It must have been because of Matt Damon.
Yes, Matt Damon does a splendid job in it.
this is not the film based on the book that I read.. in my comment about it on your other post.
i was apparently remembering the title wrong.
the one i read was a neurosurgeon who drowned and was dead for some time… and came back to life and described having gone to heaven. or some form of afterlife.
totally a different book and different experience!
just watching the trailer on this one told me it’s not my type of movie to actually enjoy.
even with or without superb acting!
but i always enjoy your thorough and intelligent reviews… regardless!
tammy j recently posted..right on cue!
I see! I will try and get a look at the book where the NS drowns and comes back to life. And thank you for the compliments.
not my cup of tea at all…
That does not surprise me at all.
I saw the movie when it first came out, as I mentioned on your earlier post. My ex was disappointed because it didn’t follow the occult aspect very well. I thought that it was well done, entertaining and left more questions unanswered than answered them, which suits my curious mind just fine.
Different strokes for different folks.
Rasheed Hooda recently posted..As I Look Back
Yes, different strokes for different folks indeed.
Comments are closed.